I think that the early visual journal exercises in which we
explored intangible concepts really helped to pick apart what it was that we
wanted to extract from our chosen texts. This has made me think differently
about the way I would approach a piece of text were I to illustrate from it.
What I found most profound about the concept of the visual journal was not the
discovery of a new way of working entirely, but rather how new methods/media
can inform and push what I already do. The collage and mixed-media portraits
informed my etchings in a way I never would have been able to by drawing
normally. The looseness of this approach led to me making images far more
expressive than I would have otherwise.
In terms of sound I’m relatively pleased as well; the windy
sound in the first half and the creepy ambiance at the end I got from
www.freesound.org - these helped against awkward silences in the animation. The
other sound effects I improvised with bits and pieces in the sound booth and
came out well. I recorded my own screaming and pitched it down to make it creepier
and more appropriate, but listening to it again I think I am a terrible voice
actor.
However, the
centipedes, which I got moving in After Effects using scripts, are simply drawn
and I feel like I missed an opportunity to make them more gruesome looking - as
they are, they look very cartoony and don't match the tone of the rest of the
animation. On top of that, Dr. Benway was hard to animate, even when rotoscoped,
and ended up goofy looking. I didn't think I had time to colour him in either,
so I didn’t, which is disappointing to look back on. I feel like these points represent
failed aspects of my proposals – namely communicating the nature of the book
and its characters.
I also feel like I could have explored more scenarios. I
made one story board and stuck to it – I think I was always going to have the
crushed head, but I wonder what else I could have had Benway doing, or if the
centipedes could have been doing something more interesting. At the same time,
I wonder if maybe I would have run the risk of it getting a bit convoluted if I
had too many different things happening one after another.
For the printed pictures, I’m not that pleased with them now,
reaching the end of the project. I feel like as illustrations, they are quite
weak. They are portraits of characters which convey a mood, but don’t tell much
of a story. Not making them floating heads as they were before helped
significantly, but only to a certain degree. My favourite prints are the
thematic ones, particularly the centipede. This one went through a lot of
thumbnailing and I think I ended up with an interesting composition that makes
for an illustration that would work standalone. I suppose they work as a set,
but inconsistencies with the dirtiness of the print are there due to my
inexperience with etching. The slip case was actually quite fun to make though
and I’m happy that I did it in the end. It makes me feel a bit better about the
images as a set.
I had wanted to do etching for years, and am happy that I finally got a chance to explore it in as much depth as I did. I enjoyed the process but think I will take a break from it.
I had wanted to do etching for years, and am happy that I finally got a chance to explore it in as much depth as I did. I enjoyed the process but think I will take a break from it.
Re-reading my project proposals for this module, it seems
like I have fulfilled them almost exactly as they are written. I think it has
been useful to work off of these self-set briefs as it makes your idea seem a
lot more rigid, giving you confidence in what you are doing.